News

The National Statistical Institute (NSI) publishes data from the population census regarding daily labor migration, which refers to the workplace location of employed individuals as of September 7, 2021. This snapshot of daily labor migration, obtained once every ten years, provides valuable information about economic processes in the country. Around 70% of the employed population in the country works in the same place where they live. However, nearly 500 thousand people work somewhere else, commuting daily to their workplace. They account for over 1/5 of all employed individuals in the country, and their movement gives a clear idea of the economic centers that attract workers. It should be noted that 121 thousand people, or a little over 5% of the employed population, work from home, which is also accounted for in the comprehensive census data.

Daily labor migration is particularly visible in the industry sector. Over half of the employed individuals in the mining industry commute to a different locality for work. This is understandable considering that mines in the country are located in small municipalities, such as in the Srednogorie region and Krumovgrad, where non-ferrous and precious metals are extracted, or in the coal-mining area of Radnevo. It is normal for these mines to attract many workers from neighboring areas. What's interesting in this case is that a large portion of this daily labor migration comes from a relatively close region - for example, around 85-90% of the staff at mining companies in the Srednogorie region come from municipalities in immediate proximity to the mine.

In manufacturing and construction, over 1/3 of workers commute to work outside their place of residence. This is also due to the specific nature of these two sectors, where large industrial facilities are often located on the outskirts of major cities, and construction generally involves labor migration toward large-scale infrastructure projects. The three main economic centers - Sofia, Plovdiv, and Varna - are examples of developed industries in peripheral municipalities that attract personnel, including from within the city itself. Regarding the industrial sector, the formation of significant economic centers in the country is evident, as they extend beyond administrative boundaries and shape the economic landscape of the country.

In the services sector, daily labor migration is much lower - less than 20% of workers in sectors such as education, healthcare, culture and sports, and administrative and professional activities commute to work outside their place of residence. Interestingly, in the field of information and communication technologies, less than 10% of employees commute to work outside their home municipality. The digital sector is heavily concentrated in the capital city, Sofia, and in some secondary centers such as Plovdiv and Varna, which suggests more permanent relocation rather than daily commuting to an office. At the same time, the digital sector stands out with the highest proportion of remote workers - over 1/3 of employees in the information and communication technologies sector work from home. In other service sectors such as professional and administrative activities, this percentage is within the range of 10-20%, while in all industrial sectors, it is practically negligible.

The regional breakdown of daily labor migration is also interesting. The highest share of workers commuting to a different locality is observed in Sofia (province) and Pernik. These two regions are closely linked to the capital city, Sofia, which undoubtedly attracts workers from neighboring areas. At the same time, both regions have an industrial character, including contributions from major companies in the Srednogorie region in Sofia Province, which explains the higher percentage of daily labor migration. The positive balance in the capital city is determined by the inflow of daily labor migration, which stands at nearly 58 thousand people. In Pernik, the negative balance due to daily labor migration is around 15 thousand people. In most other regions, the balance is within the range of 3-5 thousand people, with negative balances observed in Pazardzhik, Kyustendil, Vratsa, and Sliven, and positive balances in Plovdiv, Burgas, and Varna. The majority of daily labor migration occurs within the regions themselves. The National Statistical Institute will provide a breakdown by municipalities, including in the new analysis of economic centers in Bulgaria, which can already build upon the data from the latest census.

Against the backdrop of continuing consumer price growth, measures to increase incomes and purchasing power take center stage in parliamentary debates. At this stage, the proposal for aggressive increases in the minimum wage is leading, which threatens to further increase inflationary pressures. The current text examines the dimensions of the impact of price growth on workers' wages both at the regional level and among different economic activities.

This topic is best reflected in data on household incomes and expenditures for the third quarter of 2022. At first glance, the average household per capita income not only reaches but also surpasses the average inflation for the quarter, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) (18%), with a registered growth of 21%. However, this is a direct consequence of the aggressive increase in pensions throughout the year - the registered growth in pension income is 44% on an annual basis, compared to an 11% growth in wages, which lags significantly behind the inflation rate.

The dynamics are highly uneven among different areas of economic activity. The average lag in wage growth compared to inflation in the third quarter is just over 3 percentage points, but a noticeable difference is observed even according to the ownership form, with a slowdown of 2.6 points in the private sector and 5.5 points in the public sector. This primarily reflects the slowdown in wages in several professions in the public sector that depend on the state budget, which lacks the flexibility of the private business to adjust to changes in macroeconomic conditions. Among individual sectors, the smallest lag is observed in agriculture, government administration, and trade, while the largest one is in healthcare and education. The significant lag in hospitals and schools confirms the observation that the public sector has not been able to respond promptly to the decline in real wages of its employees. On the other hand, the outsourcing sector and processing as a whole are relatively coping well. However, there is no sector in the Bulgarian economy where wage growth exceeds that of consumer prices and achieves an increase in purchasing power.

Just like among industries, the 28 regions of the country register significant differences in wage growth compared to inflation. As expected, Vratsa performs the best with a lag of only 0.4 percentage points, thanks to the good performance of the energy sector during the year. Similar results can be seen in Vidin, Blagoevgrad, and Sofia. On the other hand, Smolyan, Razgrad, Yambol, and Lovech experience a lag of almost 10 points compared to inflation. The remaining regions fall within the entire spectrum.

The approach presented here, of course, has some obvious weaknesses - when reviewing economic activities, differences in the dynamics of remuneration for specific positions are not taken into account, and in the case of regions, the different price levels in different parts of the country and the potential for different rates of change. Despite these limitations, however, it demonstrates the heterogeneous impact of price growth on workers in various industries and regions.

This, in turn, has some obvious consequences for the way income policies are reflected, especially changes in the minimum wage, which aim to preserve purchasing power. The significant differences in starting levels as well as in the rates of development of the country's regions and individual industries require an individual approach to each of them, taking these realities into account. Instead, the currently discussed changes assume the simple linkage of the minimum wage to the dynamics of the average wage, which is extremely sensitive to the dynamics of the leading sectors and the fastest-growing regions. This will inevitably lead to even greater problems for the least developed and weakly competitive sectors.

(to be translated)

November 16, 2022

Since 2012, the Institute for Market Economics has been presenting its unique study on the social and economic conditions of the regions in Bulgaria, which is unparalleled in its scope and depth. The Regional Profiles cover 68 indicators that depict the real picture in the country's 28 regions.

All data and materials can be found at www.regionalprofiles.bg. Over the past decade, numerous challenges have been reshaping the economic and social landscape of the country, including investment and growth slowdown, the pandemic and subsequent recession, rapid recovery, political instability, the war in Ukraine, and an energy crisis in Europe. These periods have had different manifestations at the local level, testing the potential for local coping and response, allowing some regions to progress in their development, but ultimately, differences between regions persist, and the gap between the capital and the provinces, large and small, developed and poor, does not significantly narrow. On a broader scale, economic imbalances between Northern and Southern Bulgaria are predetermined by the smaller scale of economic centers in the north and weaker connectivity.

Almost every region distinguishes itself with successful performance in a specific area - for example, education in Smolyan, healthcare in Pleven, investment activity in the Sofia region, and several regions show potential for overall development improvement. The unfolding of this improvement into tangible and lasting enhancements in people's lives and the business environment depends on both the processes in major economic centers and their periphery, as well as the development of secondary economic centers that still lag behind.

In addition to Sofia (the capital), Plovdiv, Varna, Burgas, and Gabrovo, which have consistently performed well overall, the latest edition includes Stara Zagora, Veliko Tarnovo, and Ruse, which have fared relatively well through the challenges of the pandemic.

However, the greatest challenge lies in the demographic situation. The 2021 Census shed light on the severe demographic problems facing the entire country, including the capital. Data on the working-age population (15-64 years) further reveal a deep contraction of human capital - 20 out of the 28 regions have lost at least one-fifth of their workforce. While the decline in natural population growth reflects long-term processes that require vision and time for mitigation, mechanical population growth can be influenced by short-term policies.

However, the lack of adaptation to the declining population, despite being an ongoing process for years, continues to directly impact the provision of public services (education, healthcare, public order, culture, etc.) and the ability of the private sector to employ workers. The problems faced by local authorities due to demographic trends will further deepen in terms of higher costs, the need for optimization, and adaptation to new realities. To enable such adaptation, more local resources and freedom in implementing regional and municipal policies are necessary.

The regions in the country have different economic profiles that predetermine their different development trajectories. Regions with developed industries and strong penetration of digital services tend to have better performance. There are successful examples (such as a group of municipalities in the Srednogorie Regions) that demonstrate there are no insurmountable barriers to local economic and social transformation.

We expect to soon see data showing a new region in Northern Bulgaria that will experience significant improvements in the quality of life and become a dynamic economic hub that spills over its influence into peripheral areas - a process that already allows several smaller centers in Southern Bulgaria to retain and attract people and investments.

This depends on various national-level policies, but also on the powers, capacity, and financial independence of local authorities.

Video of the event (Facebook): https://fb.watch/gQzbnzLsLh/

Presentation from the event: https://ime.bg//var/images/Presentation_ALL.pdf

Summary of the study: https://www.regionalprofiles.bg/var/docs/RESUME_RegionalProfiles2022.pdf

Annual report: https://www.regionalprofiles.bg/var/docs/Reg_Profiles_BG_2022.pdf

Data: https://www.regionalprofiles.bg/bg/data/

The "Regional Profiles: Development Indicators" project is supported by the America for Bulgaria Foundation.

INVITATION

to the presentation of the research by IME

Regional Profiles: Development Indicators 2022

When: 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM / November 16, 2022 (Wednesday) Where: Live at the BTA Press Club | online on the IME and Regional Profiles Facebook pages

For over ten years, the Institute for Market Economics has been presenting the most comprehensive and in-depth study of the social and economic conditions in the regions of Bulgaria.

IME's Regional Profiles cover 68 indicators that depict the real picture in the country's 28 regions and contribute to a deeper conversation about regional development and the challenges facing local authorities.

This year, the focus of the presentation is on the actual demographic conditions at the local level, based on the latest population census.

During the presentation, we will also address the following questions:

How did the pandemic impact the regional landscape of economic development, and what is the role of local authorities in transforming the economy? Did the disparity between regions increase, and what are the driving economic forces in different areas and settlements? What are the trends in employment, unemployment, and incomes, and why have some regions lost a quarter of their population in a decade? Did the pandemic affect the outcomes of the educational system, and how did the healthcare system respond to the extraordinary circumstances? Where is crime the highest, and has the cultural life at the local level recovered? What is the potential, and what are the prospects for the regions?

All analyses, data, and other materials related to the research will be published on the dedicated website: www.regionalprofiles.bg

You can follow the event online on the BTA page.

We look forward to your presence!

The IME Team

The "Regional Profiles: Development Indicators" project is supported by the America for Bulgaria Foundation.

On November 16, 2022, the IME will present "Regional Profiles 2022." The examination of the gross domestic product (GDP) of the regions and the gross value added in different sectors of the economy highlights the differences between the north and south, as well as the distinct development trajectories of the regions in Bulgaria. In 2020, Sofia (the capital) had a GDP slightly above BGN 51 billion, which accounts for 43% of the country's total. In the south, the economy of Plovdiv (with a GDP of BGN 9.8 billion) stands out, traditionally contributing more than half of the gross product of the South-Central region. In the southeast, Stara Zagora (BGN 5.1 billion) temporarily surpasses Burgas (BGN 4.6 billion), which was hit especially hard by the pandemic. Combined, the economies of Stara Zagora and Burgas are practically equal to that of the Plovdiv region.

In the north, Varna (BGN 7.3 billion) remains an undisputed leader, despite experiencing a decline in the services sector during the pandemic. It maintains a strong industrial presence on the outskirts of the coastal city. The economy of Varna contributes slightly over a quarter of the gross product of the entire Northern Bulgaria. Veliko Tarnovo weathered the crisis relatively well and almost caught up with Ruse, both at levels around BGN 2.7 billion. These two regions have been competing in terms of economic scale for decades, with Ruse taking a slight lead in recent years. The smaller scale of economic centers in Northern Bulgaria, except for Varna, along with weaker interconnectivity between them, largely contributes to the difference between Northern and Southern Bulgaria.

The gross value added per person [1] across regions varies from nearly BGN 35,000 in Sofia (the capital) to just under BGN 8,000 in Silistra. Sofia's economy significantly differs from all others, being heavily dominated by the services sector, which accounts for 86% of the added value in the capital. Second in the country, with BGN 15,000 per person, is the Sofia region, encompassing industrial enterprises in the immediate outskirts of the capital, as well as a significant portion of mining and metallurgy in the Srednogorie region. Besides the capital and the industrial regions, Stara Zagora and Vratsa also play leading roles [2] in industry, with a high GDP per person of around 14,000-15,000 BGN, thanks to the high value-added created by energy companies. Another leader, besides the capital and industrial areas, is the Varna region, where the service sector prevails. Agriculture contributes over 10% of the added value in relatively smaller and poorer regions, mostly located in the northern part of the country.

"Regional Profiles 2022" clearly demonstrate that while the impact of the pandemic and the subsequent economic recovery is visible on the regional map, the existing significant differences between regions persist. Against the backdrop of prolonged political instability and entirely new economic challenges at the end of 2022, the development and unlocking of regional potential will be of immense importance. Local authorities need to be exceptionally active and work towards transforming their economies to achieve higher productivity and competitiveness. This includes attracting investments, developing industrial sites, collaborating with educational institutions, supporting investments in human capital, fostering regional partnerships, and thinking beyond conventional administrative boundaries. In these efforts, municipalities require support, particularly through tangible steps for financial decentralization and increased local resources.

To learn more about "Regional Profiles: Development Indicators 2022," please visit the website www.regionalprofiles.bg or attend the event organized by IME on November 16, 2022, at BTA.

----------------

[1] The team at IME has calculated the gross value added per person based on the results of the population census. The official results indicate a population of just over 6.5 million people in the country in 2021.

[2] A relatively high share of the industry is observed in Gabrovo due to the traditions of the manufacturing industry, as well as in Kardzhali and Pazardzhik, where alongside the manufacturing industry, there are also successful enterprises in the mining industry, specifically in Krumovgrad and Panagyurishte, which showed good results in 2020.

After focusing on the educational structure of the population based on the latest census data last week, today we will look at the main findings regarding labor market conditions. Since the standard issue by the National Statistical Institute (NSI) does not include detailed data for municipalities, we will concentrate on the details for the regions and the differences between age groups.

• In line with the overall negative demographic trends, the labor force (employed and unemployed) contracted in 2021 to 2,954 thousand people, a decrease of over 350 thousand compared to a decade ago. Economically, this poses serious challenges to long-term growth and emphasizes the need for a transformation towards high-value-added production and services, given the increasing expected labor shortages.
• Both genders show divergent dynamics. While there is a decrease of 0.4 percentage points among men to 48.5% in terms of labor force participation, there is an increase of 0.6 percentage points among women to 42.3% within the decade. This mainly reflects the changing labor market structure and the growth of employment in services. With both genders, but especially among men, the activity level is significantly below the levels of previous censuses, assuming that data from the country's socialist period is accurate. In terms of regional analysis, the highest activity is in Sofia (79%), while the lowest is in Kardzhali (54%).
• The employment structure of the population aged 15-64 is similar, with the capital city (75%) leading, followed by Gabrovo (68%) and Varna (65%). The significant discrepancies with the estimates from the Labor Force Survey (LFS) for some regions are striking. According to the LFS, the employment rate in Veliko Tarnovo was 72% for 2021, while the census reports it as 62%, a difference of 10 percentage points. This confirms that the census significantly improves the quality of data and enhances understanding of labor market processes.
• The manufacturing industry continues to be the main source of employment, with 474 thousand employed individuals during the census period. However, trade is catching up with 418 thousand individuals.
• The census registers an unemployment rate of 10.1% for the population aged 15-64. These data cast doubt on the registered unemployment rates reported by the Employment Agency and the NSI's own Labor Force Survey, which indicate nearly half the rate. This difference is most likely a result of underreporting unemployment among young people aged 15-24, who have the highest share of unemployment according to the census, as well as specific questionnaire characteristics.
• The data reaffirm that secondary education is crucial for labor market integration, as the unemployment rate among individuals with secondary education is three times lower than that among those with primary education, and four times lower than that among those with no education or only elementary education. Regionally, there is some reshuffling among the areas with the most serious unemployment problems, with Vidin remaining the leader at just over 20%, followed by Silistra and Targovishte at around 18%. This points to serious issues with qualifications and skills in Northeastern Bulgaria.

Overall, the presented data on the economic status of the population and labor force participation in the census reshuffle some commonly held perceptions. However, even more beneficial would be the breakdown at the municipal level, which would allow for the identification of local economic centers and employment magnets.