This map shows the condition and development of the healthcare system in all districts during the 2008-2012 period. The bright color areas of the map show that Razgrad is the district with worst healthcare development, especially during the 2008-2009 period.
The overall condition and the tendencies in the development of the healthcare system of the district of Sliven are also negative during the entire period.
During the 2008-2012 period the best performing region in this respect is Stara Zagora.
The multidimensional analysis of regional development analyzes the overall socio-economic development of Bulgarian districts in the 2008-2012 period, using a wide variety of indicators, grouped in seven categories: economy, infrastructure, demographics, education, healthcare, environment, social environment. The method chosen to achieve this is neural networks – Cohonen Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), to be precise.
Two “fake regions” have been established for the purpose of this analysis. One is a “perfect” region, which scores best (has the highest marks) on all indicators at the same time. The other one is a “worst” region, which scores worst (has the lowest marks). These “fake regions” are used as reference points and benchmarks for assessing the development of the 28 regions during this period. The current state and development of all 28 regions is assessed as positive or negative in comparison to these benchmarks.
One should note that on the maps of the different categories the best-developed territory does not necessarily coincide with the “perfect region”, neither the worst-developed territory coincides with the “worst region”. This happens because the “best” and the “worst” region are defined as such on the basis of all categories at the same time and are therefore fake and do not really exist. Empirical data shows that some regions score high in some categories and low in others.
After the analysis, the districts have been grouped into clusters, formed by Cohonen’s self-organizing maps. The results are represented by two separate methods:
If a region ranks “best” in each of the categories – from economy to social environment, it should match the “perfect” one or be very close to it. In reality, none such exists, so the regions are located all over the map. The reasons for their location can be seen in the analysis of the different categories.
The results thus represented in the Cohonen maps allow us to study the development of all regions for the entire period at the same time, visualizing:
Five Trends for the Municipalities of Burgas Region 08.05.2023
Recent years have been turbulent for the economies of Burgas municipalities - in 2020 they suffered one of...
Five Trends for the Economies of Pleven and Lovech 25.03.2023
The districts of Lovech and Pleven suffer from the typical problems of the Northwest - an aging and declining...
Presentation of Regional Profiles: Indicators of Development 2022 (English edition) 28.02.2023
For more than a decade, the Institute of Market Economics presents its unique in-depth study of the social...