This map shows the condition and development of the environmental characteristics of Bulgarian districts during the 2008-2012 period.
As is evident by the bright colors on the map, the district with the worst environment indictors during the entire period is Stara Zagora – a negative trend which is especially evident during the last few years of the period.
Similar negative tendencies are evident in the districts of Pernik and Varna.
The dark color of the map, which indicates positive environmental development is most clearly seen in the district of Gabrovo.
The multidimensional analysis of regional development analyzes the overall socio-economic development of Bulgarian districts in the 2008-2012 period, using a wide variety of indicators, grouped in seven categories: economy, infrastructure, demographics, education, healthcare, environment, social environment. The method chosen to achieve this is neural networks – Cohonen Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), to be precise.
Two “fake regions” have been established for the purpose of this analysis. One is a “perfect” region, which scores best (has the highest marks) on all indicators at the same time. The other one is a “worst” region, which scores worst (has the lowest marks). These “fake regions” are used as reference points and benchmarks for assessing the development of the 28 regions during this period. The current state and development of all 28 regions is assessed as positive or negative in comparison to these benchmarks.
One should note that on the maps of the different categories the best-developed territory does not necessarily coincide with the “perfect region”, neither the worst-developed territory coincides with the “worst region”. This happens because the “best” and the “worst” region are defined as such on the basis of all categories at the same time and are therefore fake and do not really exist. Empirical data shows that some regions score high in some categories and low in others.
After the analysis, the districts have been grouped into clusters, formed by Cohonen’s self-organizing maps. The results are represented by two separate methods:
If a region ranks “best” in each of the categories – from economy to social environment, it should match the “perfect” one or be very close to it. In reality, none such exists, so the regions are located all over the map. The reasons for their location can be seen in the analysis of the different categories.
The results thus represented in the Cohonen maps allow us to study the development of all regions for the entire period at the same time, visualizing:
Code | Name |
---|---|
BGS | Burgas |
BLG | Blagoevgrad |
DOB | Dobrich |
GAB | Gabrovo |
HKV | Haskovo |
JAM | Yambol |
KNL | Kyustendil |
KRZ | Kardzali |
LOV | Lovech |
MON | Montana |
PAZ | Pazardzhik |
PDV | Plovdiv |
PER | Pernik |
PVN | Pleven |
RAZ | Razgrad |
RSE | Ruse |
SFO | Sofia |
SHU | Shumen |
SLS | Silistra |
SLV | Sliven |
SML | Smolyan |
SOF | Sofia (capitol) |
SZR | Stara Zagora |
TGV | Targovishte |
VAR | Varna |
VID | Vidin |
VRC | Vratsa |
VTR | Veliko Tarnovo |
MAX | „Идеална област“ |
MIN | „Най-слаба област“ |
What are the top and worst performing regions in education 19.09.2023
To mark the start of the school year, we are raising the curtain slightly on the Education category of the...
The minimum wage mechanism needs urgent repair 13.09.2023
Towards the end of last week, the current proposal to change the level of the minimum wage was published. It...
Observations on the huge math school entrance score gap by regions 04.09.2023
The Class VIII admission campaign for the next academic year is almost over and perhaps now is the right time...