Regional Profiles
Български English
  • Български English
  • Administration
  • Home
  • News
  • Research
    • Research 2025
    • Research 2024
    • Research 2023
    • Research 2022
    • Research 2021
    • Research 2019
    • Research 2019
    • Research 2018
    • Research 2017
    • Research 2016
    • Research 2015
    • Research 2014
    • Research 2013
    • Research 2012
    • Neural Networks
  • Districts
  • Economic Centres
    • Economic Centres - 2023
    • Economic Centres - 2017
  • Municipal Analysis
  • Data
    • Regional Data
    • Methodology
    • Maps
  • About us
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • References
    • FAQ
    • Events
    • Working Meetings

Administration

Indicators

Period, unit of measurement and source

Active transparency rating of local government bodies

The active transparency ratings of local government bodies are assigned
by the AIP Foundation based on the results of its annual studies of municipal web pages and electronic submission of requests to various administrative structures within the executive branch. The rating assigned to each district is the average of all the ratings given to the municipalities within it.

  • 2016-2024
  • %
  • Access to Information Program Foundation (AIP Foundation)

Level of development of e-government

The indicator shows the results of local governments’ self-assessment regarding the degree and scope of the electronic services they provide.
A low rating indicates a complete lack or rudimentary development of e-government, while a high rating shows a capacity for carrying out two-way transactions between the local administration and citizens/businesses.

  • 2013-2024
  • rating from 1 to 4
  • Request for access to information under APIA

Level of development of one-stop shop services

The indicator shows the results from the local governments’ self-assessment regarding the extent of their readiness to operate one-stop shop services.

  • 2013-2024
  • Rating: 1 to 4
  • Request for access to information under APIA

Share of own revenues in the municipalities’total revenues

This ratio shows to what extent each municipality can meet its own needs without relying on the state budget.

  • 2015-2023
  • %
  • MF
 

Coverage of municipal expenditures with local revenues

The indicator shows the dependence of municipal budgets on transfers from the state budget.

 

  • 2015–2023
  • %
  • MF

 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENTSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

Income and living conditionsIncome and living conditions

DemographicsDemographics

Labour marketLabour market

EducationEducation

InvestmentsInvestments

HealthcareHealthcare

InfrastructureInfrastructure

Security and justiceSecurity and justice

Taxes and administrationTaxes and administration

EnvironmentEnvironment

AdministrationAdministration

CultureCulture

To the top
Regions in Bulgaria
  • Blagoevgrad
  • Burgas
  • Varna
  • Veliko Tarnovo
  • Vidin
  • Vratsa
  • Gabrovo
  • Dobrich
  • Kardzali
  • Kyustendil
  • Lovech
  • Montana
  • Pazardzhik
  • Pernik
  • Pleven
  • Plovdiv
  • Razgrad
  • Ruse
  • Silistra
  • Sliven
  • Smolyan
  • Sofia
  • Sofia (capital)
  • Stara Zagora
  • Targovishte
  • Haskovo
  • Shumen
  • Yambol
All categories
  • Economic development
  • Income and living conditions
  • Labour market
  • Investments
  • Infrastructure
  • Taxes and administration
  • Administration
  • Social development
  • Demographics
  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Security and justice
  • Environment
  • Culture
A project of
Institute for Market Economics
Sponsored by
“America for Bulgaria” Foundation
2025  ©  Institute for Market Economics
Created by MTR Design